notes

 (

index

)

An approximation to an efficient fundamental physics curriculum

keywords

outline

see the latex / pdf version of this on overleaf and posted to my website log

Introduction

Basic question

What is an approximation to a physics curriculum that is co-optimized between the goals of being both comprehensive (up to the fringe of existing experimental verification, but not necessarily quite rigorous enough to prepare for original research) and efficient?

Before reviewing t proposed curriculum it would be reasonable to consider the much broader and more comprehensive perspective from Gerard ’t Hooft: How to become a GOOD Theoretical Physicist

Global perspective

I think it is helpful to be aware of the following perspectives before getting started

A quote regarding the relationship between the local and global structure of theoretical physics “All of physics has two aspects: a local or even infinitesimal aspect, and a global aspect. Much of the standard lore deals just with the local and infinitesimal aspects -* the __perturbative__ aspects and [[file:fiber_bundle.org]fiber bundles play little role there. But they are the all-important structure that governs the global -* the __non-perturbative__ -* aspect. Bundles are the __global__ structure of physical fields and they are irrelevant only for the crude local and perturbative description of reality.” [Note: Of course…the latter should not be viewed as a criticism as those are the components that support concrete calculations that make direct contact with the analysis of experiments] –[Urs Schreiber response to physics.stackexchange question: Intuitively, why are bundles so important in Physics?]] A paragraph written by Edward Witten p. 280 in the 1986 Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians and on p. 20 in Physics and geometry by Edward Witten in 1986 (see below) taken with update from Eric Weinstein’s, The Portal ‘Graph, Wall, Tome project’ If one wants to summarize our knowledge of physics in the briefest possible terms, there are really three fundamental observations

  1. Space-time is a pseudo-Riemannian manifold, \[M\], endowed with a metric tensor and governed by geometrical laws
  2. Over \[M\] is a principal \[G\]-bundle, \[P_G\], with a non-Abelian structure group \[G\]
  3. Fermions are sections of \[\hat{S}_+ \otimes V_R \oplus \hat{S}_* \otimes V_{\tilde{R}}\]. \[R\] and \[\tilde{R}\] are not isomorphic, but should be complex linear representations of \[G\]
  4. ? Higgs

All of this must be supplemented with the understanding that the geometrical laws obeyed by the metric tensor, the gauge fields, and the fermions are to be interpreted in quantum mechanical terms.

Resources

Written texts (not necessarily in this order)

Overviews

General relativity

Quantum field theory

Statistical physics

Symmetry

Global structure

Lectures

Overviews

General relativity

Quantum field theory

Statistical physics

Global structure

Potential directions for future development

Evolving pedagogy

Executable physics for independent verification of understanding concrete computations

An important goal would be to translate a minimal set of computations from textbook format to an open source computer algebra system such as Maxima maxima in Jupyter likely making use of Viktor Toth’s up-to-date implementations of atensor, ctensor, itensor ( paper) )

Examples that approximate this goal are

Links to this note