notes

 (

index

)

A brief history of Western Philosophy by Anthony Kenny in 2019

1. Philosophy in its infancy

1.1 The Milesians

1.2 Xenophanes

1.3 Heraclitus

1.4 The school of Parmenides

1.5 Empedocles

1.6 The Atomists

2. The Athens of Socrates

2.1 The Athenian Empire

2.2 Anaxagoras

2.3 The sophists

2.4 Socrates

2.5 The Euthyphro

2.6 The Crito

2.7 The Phaedo

3. The philosophy of Plato

3.1 Life and works

3.2 The theory of ideas

3.3 Plato’s republic

3.4 The Theaetetus and the Sophist

4. The system of Artistotle

4.1 Plato’s pupil, Alexander’s teacher

4.2 The foundation of logic

4.3 The theory of drama

4.4 Moral philosophy: virtue and happiness

4.5 Moral philosophy: wisdom and understanding

4.6 Politics

4.7 Science and explanation

4.8 Words and things

4.9 Motion and change

4.10 Soul, sense, and intellect

4.11 Metaphysics

5. Greek philosophy after Aristotle

5.1 The Hellenistic Era

5.2 Epicureanism

5.3 Stoicism

5.4 Scepticism

5.5 Rome and its empire

5.6 Jesus of Nazareth

5.7 Christianity and Gnosticism

5.8 Neo-Platonism

6. Early Christian philosophy

6.1 Arianism and Orthodoxy

6.2 The theology of incarnation

6.3 The life of Augustine

6.4 The City of God and the Mystery of Grace

6.5 Boethius and Philoponus

7. Early Medieval philosophy

7.1 John the Scot

7.2 Alkindi and Avicenna

7.3 The Feudal system

7.4 Saint Anselm

7.5 Abelard and Heloise

7.6 Abelard’s logic

7.7 Abelard’s ethics

7.8 Averroes

8. Philosophy in the Thirteenth century

8.1 An age of innovation

8.2 Sain Bonaventure

8.3 Thirteenth-Century logic

8.4 Aquinas’ life and works

8.5 Aquinas’ natural theology

8.6 Matter, form, substance, and accident

8.7 Aquinas on essence and existence

8.8 Aquinas’ Philosophy of Mind

8.9 Aquinas’ Moral Philosophy

9. Oxford philosophers

9.1 The Fourteenth-Century University

9.2 Duns Scotus

9.3 Ockham’s logic of language

9.4 Ockham’s political theory

9.6 The Oxford calculators

9.7 John Wyclif

10. Renaissance philosophy

10.1 The renaissance

10.2 Free-will: Rome vs. Louvain

10.3 Renaissance Platonism

10.4 Machiavelli

10.5 More’s Utopia

10.6 The Reformation

10.7 Post-Reformation Philosophy

10.8 Bruno and Galileo

10.9 Francis Bacon

11. The age of Descartes

11.1 The wars of religion

11.2The life of Descartes

11.3 The doubt and the Cogito

11.4 The essence of mind

11.5 God, mind, and body

11.6 The material world

12. English philosophy in the Seventeenth Century

12.1 The Empiricism of Thomas Hobbes

12.2 Hobbes’ political philosophy

12.3 The political theory of John Locke

12.4 Locke on ideas and qualities

12.5 Substances and persons

13. Continental philosophy in the age of Louis XIV

13.1 Blaise Pascal

13.2 Spinoza and Malebranche

13.3 Leibniz

14. British philosophy in the Eighteenth century

14.1 Berkeley

14.2 Hume’s Philosophy of Mind

14.3 Hume on causation

14.4 Reid and Common Sense

15. The Enlightenment

15.1 The Philosophes

15.2 Rousseau

15.3 Revolution and romanticism

16. The critical philosophy of Kant

16.1 Kant’s Copernican Revolution

16.2 The Transcendental Aesthetic

16.2 The Transcendental Analytic: The Deduction of the Categories

16.3 The Transcendental Dialectic: The Paralogisms of Pure Reason

16.4 The Transcendental Dialectic: The Antinomies of Pure Reason

16.5 The Transcendental Dialectic: The Critique of Natural Theology

16.6 Kant’s Moral Philosophy

17. German Idealism and Materialism

17.1 Fichte

17.2 Hegel

  • The subject matter of logic is the Absolute, the totality of reality, familiar to us from earlier philosophers as Being. We start from the thesis that the Absolute is pure Being. But pure Being without any qualities is nothing; so we are led to the antithesis ‘The Absolute is nothing’. This thesis and antithesis are overcome by synthesis: the union of Being and Unbeing is becoming, and so we say ‘The Absolute is Becoming’.
  • Hegel does make use of Aristotle’s definition of God when he describes the Absolute as being the Thought which thinks itself. But it turns out that the self-awareness of the Absolute comes at the end, not at the beginning, of this life-cycle, and it is brought into existence by the philosophical reflection of human beings. It is the history of philosophy which brings the Absolute face to face with itself.

17.3 Marx and the Young Hegelians

  • Marx divided the past, present, and future history of the relations of production into six phases: primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism, and ultimate communism
  • He based this conclusion on two economic theories: the labour theory of value, and the theory of surplus value.
  • Under capitalism, however, prices in the market are determined not by true value, but by supply and demand. The capitalist, who owns the raw material and the means of production, having paid the worker a wage equal to his day’s subsistence, say 1, can often sell the product for many times that sum, say 10. The difference between the subsistence wage and the market price is the surplus value, in this case 9. Under capitalism, no part ofthis surplus value is returned to the worker, it is all pocketed by the employer. The effect is that only one-tenth ofthe labourer’s work is for his own benefit; nine-tenths of it is just to produce profit for the capitalist.

17.4 Capitalism and its discontents

18. The Utilitarians

18.1 Jeremy Bentham

18.2 The Utilitarianism of J.S. Mill

18.3 Mill’s Logic

19. Three Nineteenth-Century Philosophers

19.1 Schopenhauer

19.2 Kierkegaard

19.3 Nietzsche

20. Three Modern Masters

20.1 Charles Darwin

20.2 John Henry Newman

20.3 Sigmund Freud

21. Logic and the foundations of mathematics

21.1 Frege’s logic

21.2 Frege’s logicism

21.3 Frege’s philosophy of logic

21.4 Russell’s paradox

21.5 Russell’s theory of descriptions

21.6 Logical analysis

22. Continental philosophy in the early twentieth century

22.1 Henri Bergson

22.2 Husserl’s phenomenology

22.3 The existentialism of Heidegger

22.4 The existentialism of Sartre and de Beauvoir

23. The philosophy of Wittgenstein

23.1 Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

  • Its central doctrine is the picture theory of meaning. According to this theory, language consists of propositions which picture the world. Propositions are the perceptible expressions of thoughts, and thoughts are logical pictures of facts; the world is the totality of facts.

23.2 Logical positivism

23.3 Philosophical investigations

24. Recent continental philosophy

24.1 The Frankfurt School

24.2 Jacques Derrida

24.3 Jurgen Habermas

25. Recent analytic philosophy

25.1 Elizabeth Anscombe

25.2 W.V.O. Quine

25.3 Donald Davidson

  • a satisfactory theory of meaning must give an account of how the meanings of sentences depend upon the meanings of words

25.4 Peter Geach

25.5 Peter Strawson

25.6 American metaphysics

25.7 The Cartesian revival

  • Philosophers who have been convinced by Wittgenstein see qualia as just the latest example of the ineffable private experiences that the private language argument was supposed to have killed off. But certainly in the United States many philosophers appear comfortable with the idea, and it has been passed on also to neuroscientists, many of whom have thereby become unconscious dualists. Many philosophers and psychologists believe that the task of a scientific theory of the mind is to establish a principle of correlation between the occurrence of mental states and processes and the occurrence of states and processes in the brain. This correlation would only be a possibility if mental events (e.g. thoughts, or flashes of understanding) were them? selves measureable in the way in which physical events are measurable.

25.8 Analytical ethics

25.9 John Rawls

25.10 Richard Rorty

  • Mainstream, systematic philosophy aims at truth, but there is another form of philosophy that aims at self-formation, which Rorty styles ‘edification’. Edification is a project of finding new, better, more interesting, more fruitful ways of speaking. Edifying philosophers are sceptical about systematic philosophy.
  • ‘Great systematic philosophers, like great scientists, build for eternity. Great edifying philosophers destroy for the sake of their own generation.’
  • one can concede to [Rorty] that Descartes did great damage to philosophy by giving it an epistemological turn without agreeing that the damage is irreparable. It is, in fact, possible to return to the pre-Cartesian, Aristotelian conception of human nature, and it is perfectly arguable that this was what that great edifier Wittgenstein actually achieved.
  • ‘What has to be overcome is not a difficulty of the understanding, but of the will. The job to be done is really a job on oneself.’